Ever
since government regulations began phasing out the traditional light bulb in
2012, the once-simple visit to the lighting aisle has become an exercise in
navigating a dizzying array of choices and terminologies, especially for new
kinds of compact fluorescents and LEDs.
Now,
those choices are about to become even more complicated. Two start-up companies
are poised to begin selling bulbs that use entirely different technologies —
one borrowed from heavy industry and the other from old-fashioned televisions —
but meet the new energy standards.
Whether
they can capture customers who remain stubbornly wedded to incandescent light
is anybody's guess. But that both have come this far is an indication of how
unsettled the consumer lighting
market remains, despite years of promotion for the new energy-saving
options.
"It's
going to be a really long putt to try to replace the incandescent," said
Mark Rea, director of the Lighting
Research Center at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. "People hate
change of any kind. We make light sources today that are better than
incandescent by any metric at delivering the benefits you're expecting from
lighting. But it's different."
Indeed,
incandescent bulbs — whether leftover store inventory of standard lights or
halogen models that meet the new regulations, which went fully into effect in
January — outsell other types by far at big-box stores like Home Depot and
Lowe's, lighting executives there say. In the last quarter of 2013, according
to statistics from the National Electrical Manufacturers Association,
incandescent bulbs accounted for 65 percent of shipments from manufacturers,
with the remainder consisting of mainly compact fluorescents.
Even
as government officials, manufacturers and retailers focus their efforts on
improving and marketing LED technology, researchers and entrepreneurs have been
pursuing others, convinced that none of the options on the market offer
consumers a close enough match to the familiar light quality at a low enough
price. LED bulbs, for example, offer light quality that many experts say is equal
to or better than the traditional incandescent bulbs, but their price — often
$10 a bulb or less after starting out several years ago at about twice that —
has scared off consumers.
No comments:
Post a Comment